HomeProcessesConceptsMind MappingAssertionRoot CauseApplicationSoftware

The 4R Workflow Model - the art of ground level productivity

There is a group of productivity experts that promotes basically the same underlying concept on how to handle all the stuff that fills your inboxes in an efficient way that promotes control, overview and a stress-free mind.

David Allen (link) has developed what he calls Get Things Done (GTD®), Sally McGhee (link) calls her version 4D, Laura Stack (link) calls her version 6D and FranklinCovey (link) calls their version File-Act-Delete (FAD).

We will call the process the 4R's Workflow Model, since the underlying key concept is about the four questions you must ask yourself and not about what you do after you have answered the questions.

The model is based on the three main questions:

  • Is the item Relevant, can I Commit? Is it relevant to me, my interests, my commitments or my goals - if not, you should reject the request or delete the item.

  • Does the item Require Action? - if not, you can either archive it for later reference or place it on a someday/maybe list if the item is an action/project that may be relevant in the future. You must review the validity of these items' status on a monthly basis to see if they may be obsolete or may now require action.

  • Is the item Related to an existing Outcome? - if not, you must track the outcome on a project list of you personal projects (outcomes requiring more than one action to complete). Since your work is defined from and by your outcomes, capture and tracking them makes reviewing and planning more effective.

  • Is there a clear Real Next Action? - if not, you must backtrack the required steps to get the desired outcome by identifying the very first thing to do that will keep this moving forward. Identifying the real next action for a task will ensure you have more opportunities to start the action and to avoid crisis which leads to stress.

Now that you have only clearly identifiable Real Next Action items left, you can choose what to do with them.

  • Micro-management of all items to determine priorities will produce a bigger workload than simply getting rid of all small items, so the initial action is to simply do all action items that requires less than two minutes to complete. This will also let you get the benefit of checking off a lot of things so you mentally feel you have accomplished something.

  • Next option is to delegate if you can. This way you have less to do yourself and can focus on the important tasks that requires your involvement. Often we have a reluctance to delegate as if we were the only person that could do a task well, but we must keep in mind that everything does not have to be perfect - often "good" is good enough or all that is required!

  • Then we must differentiate between the tasks we have left to do whether they are time dependant or not. If they are, we must book time to do them in the calendar or commit to do them on a certain day.

  • The rest of the items are placed on our task list to be done between appointments using priorities and the situation or context.

So far we have done the things that took less than two minutes and only processed the rest. Processing your inboxes is not about doing things, it's about emptying, understanding and organizing the items. When this is done, we can return to "doing" things.

Actually Doing Tasks

On a day to day basis we should use our calendar and our task list as our control panel, since they hold all appointments and commitments. First we do the planned commitments that are in the calendar and then we prioritize among the items in the task list.

  • The important tasks are booked in the calendar when we do our weekly planning and review to ensure they will be done. Keep in mind the Pareto principle of 80/20 - e.g. 20% of your effort will generate 80% of the outcome, so focus on the most important 20% first and you will easily achieve 80% of your goals. You should be careful not to focus on the 20% of your tasks that will take 80% of your time but does not generate proportional results.

  • Priorities should be based on what we actually can do in a given context, what time we have available and the energy level we have. When these criteria has been established we can use importance and urgency to determine the priority. This is also why it is important to plan on a weekly basis, so you can ensure you are in the right context as well as have time and energy for the important tasks.

  • Understand your energy levels during the day and utilize them. I recommend watching the "stress" webcast by Dr. Kathleen Hall (link). If you understand your energy levels you can plan better and achieve more, e.g. work when you are mentally focused and cook/shop/exercise/relax when you are mentally extorted. If your employer allows this kind of flexibility and if your work area as well as family allows you to do so, you should look into the ability to work in intervals and from home.

Sources/Links:

Business Webcasts
4D process by Sally McGhee
David Allen Webcast: Knowledge Worker Athletics
David Allen on YouTube
Laura Stack Webcast: Processing, Organizing, and Reducing Wasted Time
Sally McGhee Webcast: Tips for Using Microsoft Office Outlook to Remove the Clutter from Your Computer (and Your Mind)
Sally McGhee Webcast: Tips for Reducing Your Inbox from Thousands to Just a Few E-mails